Commercial Energy Savings - Which Approach is Best?

Because there are various ways to control how muchon an energy audit, allowing you to see how much
energy a building uses, there are various approachesyou'll benefit from the measures.
to achieving commercial energy savings, with some ofA third method for cutting energy cost is power rate
them being more effective than others. When apicking. In rate picking, a company hires a power rate
company decides to pursue commercial energybrokerage and consultancy firm to negotiate the lower
savings, there are numerous factors that influence itsgas and electric rates with a utility provider. As a cost
approach, with the biggest being how much ancutting method, the biggest drawback of rate picking is
approach costs to implement. As a result, somethat negotiated rates can't be depended on to stay the
companies choose to control their energy usage withsame over the long term. While rate picking can indeed
the oldest conservation method of all: manuallysave company's money, it is best pursued in tandem
monitoring a building's energy components (lights,with other energy saving measures, such as the
machines, air conditioning, etc.) in an attempt to cutconservation measures and energy saving retrofits.
unnecessary usage. Although not resulting inA fourth method for lowering utility cost is implementing
consistently high cost savings, manually adjustingenergy efficient design in the form of energy efficient
energy usage has the advantage of costing nothing.retrofits, with the two most common targets being
But it has the disadvantage of bothering workers withHVAC systems and interior lighting systems, which
something outside of their job description: monitoringcombine to account for the majority of a building's
energy usage, which is not something that aenergy usage. Compared to other energy saving
professional company would encourage.measures, energy efficient design offers the most
If a company wants to curb energy usage throughannual savings, with a 50 percent or higher reduction in
conservation measures, a better approach is tototal annual energy cost being common. However,
implement official energy conservation measures, suchimplementing efficient design is also the most costly
as a lighting control system, which dims or turns offmeasure, although the phenomenal ROI of most
lights on a set schedule or when no movement isenergy efficiency projects, along with the fact that
present; an improved building envelope, whichenergy efficiency providers now offer attractive
maximizes the heating and cooling effects producedfinancing, can eradicate this concern. Overall, achieving
by an HVAC system; and energy efficient windowsthe highest savings doesn't depend on choosing a
and doors, which serve the same purpose as ansingle cost saving option, but on combining as many
improved building envelope. Unlike manually controllingoptions as possible. For companies that are dedicated
energy usage, controlling it with the above methods willto reducing energy usage, this usually means combining
result in purchase and installation cost. But an energyenergy conservation measures and power rate picking
efficient consulting firm will present an ROI that's basedwith energy efficient design.