Green Lighting - Dark Sky - $1.7 Billion Government Secret Ops Program?

INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW:STAR standards, and expand education about light
Dark Sky: $1.7 billion programpollution.
Government Secret Ops Program?- July 25, 2008 - The Wall Street Journal publishes "It's
LEARN THE SHOCKING DETAILS INSIDE:All About the Lighting: City Lights Are Obscuring Our
WARNING: The following involves a privateStarry Nights"
organization steamrolling their agenda with the support- June 20, 2008 -- IDA and fellow endorsing
of congressional members, a very revealing andorganizations host a congressional briefing, showing the
detailed graphic image, and may not be suitable forU.S. government that light pollution is a national (and
young children. We suggest you also secure your petsinternational) issue that should be considered at the
and lock your front door.federal level. IDA highlighted the consequences
Program Objectives: Helpful or Sinister?associated with improper night lighting.
Dark Sky is the project codename of The International- June 12, 2008 - The Daily Star, a newspaper serving
Dark Sky Association (IDA), a 501(c)3 nonprofit"the Heartland of New York", publishes a health-related
corporation whose mission is to "preserve and protectarticle, "Doctor speaks out on artificial light"
the nighttime environment and our heritage of dark- March 14, 2008 - US News and World Report
skies through quality outdoor lighting."publishes, "Turning Out the Lights"
Sounds sinister. But wait, it gets scarier. Read on:- August 20, 2007 - The New Yorker publishes "The
The IDA is no nerdy high school astronomy club tryingDark Side"
to get better views of the Milky Way. With offices inThe White House and the Pentagon aren't directly
Tucson, Belgium, and Australia, and 11,000 members ininvolved yet. (The White House is connected, since
79 countries paying up to $10,000 each, a robustENERGY STAR is a joint program of the Department
educational initiative, and a public relations machine thatof Environmental Protection and the Department of
has national media spotlighting them and congressionalEnergy. Their department heads report to the
members writing letters to support them, IDA has beenPresident.)
a rising star in responsible and energy-efficient lighting.But with a bit of creative thinking backed by research, I
True, all the IDA wants is to return nighttime skies tofeel confident the IDA can find ways to make light
their natural state for the sake of astronomy buffs andpollution reduction very appealing to military and
moonlit lovers. They have found a number of ways tostrategic national interests.
appeal to a wider audience through environmentalIs There Anything You Can You Do To Shrink This
benefits (reducing 1.2 million tons of carbon dioxideWaste?
from 6 million tons of coal or 23 million tons of oil, andYes. The IDA offer this overall suggestion:
more robust animal populations) and financial benefits"Do the best possible professional lighting design for
($1.7 billion of wasted money can be reclaimed throughthe task. Include all relevant factors such as glare, light
efficiency). And through their well-orchestrated publictrespass, and light pollution."
relations momentum, we may get 2009 ENERGYSpecifically, they give four solutions minimize light
STAR specifications for outdoor lighting.pollution without compromising in any way nighttime
They certainly sound like a private sector fancy, fatsafety, security, or utility:
cat, pork-barreling special interest group manipulating
everyone through public relations in order to serve five1. Use night lighting only when necessary. Turn off lights
or ten core members at the expense of the rest to us.when they are not needed. Timers can be very
Except we are all served by their efforts; there is noeffective. Use the correct amount of light for the need;
"rest of us."more is not better.
Who's Funding The $1.7 Billion To Light Up the United2. Direct the light downward, where it is needed. The
States Sky?use and effective placement of well-designed fixtures
The answer is you and me. This is IDA's estimate ofwill achieve excellent lighting control. When possible,
the cost of the lighting that goes directly into the U.S.retrofit or replace all existing fixtures of poor quality. In
nighttime sky. Add billions of dollars more to get theall cases, the goal is to use fixtures that control the light
global total.well, minimizing glare, light trespass, light pollution, and
Revealing NASA Photo Catches Everyone in the Actenergy usage.
A NASA composite photo of the entire Earth shows3. Use low pressure sodium (LPS) light sources
lights visible from space, including the global hotspotswhenever possible. This is the best possible light
such as the United States ($1.7 billion wasted tosource to minimize adverse effects on astronomical
generate US lights), Western Europe, Japan, andactivities. LPS lamps are also the most energy-efficient
Western China.light sources that exist. Areas where LPS is especially
The White House, Pentagon, and Congress . . .good include street lighting, parking lot lighting, security
IDA is becoming an unstoppable juggernaut, andlighting, and any application where color rendering is not
increasingly successful in gaining wider mediacritical.
coverage and federal government support.4. Avoid development near existing observatories, and
Study and learn from this sequence carefully - itapply rigid controls on outdoor lighting when
shows a well-orchestrated public relations strategy todevelopment is unavoidable. Such controls do not
get changes enacted at the national level. (I omitted acompromise safety, security, or utility. Outdoor lighting
lot of their local and regional media coverage and theirordinances and codes have been enacted by many
successes in penetrating scientific communities andcommunities to enforce quality and effective nighttime
professional and trade organizations. You can seelighting.
more on their home page.)You can see these are practical solutions.
And whatever you do, we strongly warn you to notDark Sky: "Come Over to The Dark Side"?
get in their way.Being a mission-driven, membership-based organization,
Some recent events and coverage:it seems unlikely. But we were not able to penetrate
- August 30, 2008 - The New York Times publishesthe well-protected Inner Sanctum of the smoke-filled
an essay, "Helping the Stars Take Back the Night"back room where morals typically drop like stones in
- August 20, 2008 - ENERGY STAR releases pendingorder to get the real deals made.
2009 guidelines for specifications calling for full shieldingLet us just hope that the IDA does not go over to The
of solid state lighting (LED) luminaire street lights.Dark Side. For now, the artificially bright night sky has a
- August 4, 2008 - Eleven members of Congressdim future.
write a letter to the EPA, requesting it to begin toGet links to the NASA image and the news stories
define light pollution; list its effects on health, safety, andreferenced above.
the environment; incorporate these into ENERGY